1 How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives

Alysa Haskins edited this page 2025-02-03 22:17:24 +08:00

For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And drapia.org there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, iuridictum.pecina.cz based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, considering that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, koha-community.cz and created "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to broaden his variety, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, akropolistravel.com you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, hikvisiondb.webcam authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for imaginative functions ought to be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective but let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor wiki.rrtn.org to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best performing markets on the unclear promise of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national data library including public information from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of claims against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, dokuwiki.stream I believe that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm unsure the length of time I can remain positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.